I’m not knowledgeable at all in this field, my belief is that the shot does not treat the infection once it’s caught.
The shot is preventative. Similarly to the flue, the flue shot is not to cure the illness but to prevent it.
This makes sense in my head 🤷♂️
When there is no evidence to support a hypothesis, then It is nothing more than a belief. This really is the core of all the fiction that people believe in the world today. They have no evidence for their beliefs, yet they continue to believe them anyway.
This is a very simple logic problem. One does not need to be a 'trained expert' to figure this out.
If an infection occurs in the lungs, then in order to target that infection with antibodies, they need to be able to get to the infection. The spike protein antibody has no pathway to get into the lungs using parenteral administration.
The lung barrier prevents water molecules from getting into the lungs. Water has a molecular weight of 18 daltons.
The spike protein has a molecular weight of over 150,000 daltons.
There is no possible way it could ever get to the infection to treat it, because it cannot cross the lung barrier. Therefore, without explaining this problem, everything else supporting this belief HAS to be invalid.
Also, flu shots don't prevent flu. They never have.
Us non-medical people need to seek out trusted sources, then draw our own conclusion base one's specific need.
Here is one trusted source for me.
All government agencies, medical institutions, main stream media, and most social networks have been corporate captured. I have zero trust in them and it may never be restored.
