They are expecting entities to self-kyc.

Basically to say to yourself that you are yourself.

Also they are assuming that all the network/s of all non-kyc crypto users will have to use/access a kyc network in the future.

I find that funny, coming from so called "experts".

If they don't want my money fine, I find someone that will.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nobody will want your non kyc bitcoin because its useless, and if you use to buy something you will lose the sats and get nothing from them.

E quem seria "ninguΓ©m"? As redes em conluio com o estado? Ok, melhor comprar de outros. Alternativas sempre existem e existirΓ£o.

Com uma moeda traqueavel? Boa sorte com isso.

Ninguem usa bit nos dark markets por algum motivo

Ok, rastreiem-me se puderem. Gostaria de ver como.

Precisamente desta maneira aqui πŸ‘‡

https://securalab.org/publications/pdfs/EuroSP23revelio.pdf

Maybe you don't have anybody that will accept your non-kyc tokens.

I do

And many other people do.

I dont care, i will not leave my money in a system that leverages the state, and this migth not be what you want to listen but this is not what separating money from states looks like

That's a slightly different issue. Who cares about state if you can transact between people regardless of restrictions.

If I am not mistaken, for you only Monero is the solution.

I care about separate money from the state and Monero is not the only solution but is one of the tools