I'm Amillennial. Was surprised to hear a premil guy say that. I mean, Col. 3. I mean, "here we have no continuing city," we "look for a better, one with foundations," etc. I mean Romans 8 - sheeps to the slaughter. I mean that Christ repeatedly told us that he has overcome the world and to not lose heart in the face of tribulation. We don't win in a geopolitical kingdom of God consummated now kind of way. That is "not yet."

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’ve been thinking a lot about this recently.

Do you feel like this graphic is accurate in describing your position?

It’s been one of the more helpful graphics for me as of late in trying to wrap my head around all of it.

https://christianhistoryinstitute.org/resources/PDF/end-timeline.pdf

Not quite. I'd follow Vos, from his Pauline Eschatology:

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=468x198&blurhash=Z4Rysf%25M-%3Bof%3FcD%24%7EqRjD%25xuxv_N%3FbD%25M%7BMxayxu%25M9E-%3Dt74nt8D%24t7%25M%25MxuR%25NFxvofoft6of&x=54fdf3c1bab0ef0db4bc3f7d0185d3890f7434172de40e7cc268818857f511c8

You can still be optimistic as an amill guu though. Jmac is dispensationalist, i dont think that counts as a legitimate premil position, but then again, maybe he isnt leaky anymore.

Yeah, I think he's still a "progressive dispensationalist" which IMO is out of bounds given the argument of Romans 9 and Galatians, etc.

Amil gang 🤙

Dr. V baucham is my dog for end times takes