āStuck in technical mindsetā? Lol dudeā¦ BIPs are technical changes, and this one is a joke.
Thought the opposite tbh. nostr:nprofile1qqsvak4cr0jzaarahhn98a9602e94sa2xt8u9dnjac8cns86lzp0z0spzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuendwsh8w6t69e3xj7sprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujummjv9hxwetsd9kxctnyv4mqhehqxh seemed influenced by own incentives, stuck in technical mindset, offered no opinion on Bitcoin as money and how to protect that.
Sounded like he cared sweet fuk all about the little guy who wants to run a node and contribute to the network, or doesnāt have enough Bitcoin to play futures bets with him. And nostr:nprofile1qqsd0uazmzmhwseeym3rjhf3txyjapreapc6sq8yq8cy07cg45tlx2cpp4mhxue69uhkyunz9e5k7tcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhst99y68 soft-cocked his way around opportunities to challenge or focus on the real issue at hand: Bitcoin as money.
Discussion
I was referring to technical vs moral. If his purpose on the pod was to purely explain the BIP, fair play. Felt he didnāt speak enough to why the BIP though. Saying Bitcoin is anarchy is not enough, or entirely true. Rules can be changed, and have been contentiously by a small group of rulers.
It is true. Bitcoin is anarchy. Just because rules can change doesnāt make it not anarchy.