Would you agree with this sentence about the purpose of proof-of-work? 
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_work
Discussion
No. That statement is flawed.
I thought so too. nostr:nprofile1qqsvf646uxlreajhhsv9tms9u6w7nuzeedaqty38z69cpwyhv89ufcqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhs0ewmnv what do you think?
“Large energy requirements” is vague and subjective for starters.