If climate change were so important, 1) we’d have a lot of nuclear power and 2) the public would be far far more exposed to the actual science itself.

Why? 1) best energy bang for the carbon buck and 2) science is the only means of trust free argumentation.

Critical evaluation of scientific methods and data is not some highly sophisticated endeavor only few people are capable of. At least 10% of society can do this.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

💯🎯

Where have all the butterflies 🦋 gone?

Science & destruction is everywhere …