The weirdness was a result of dozens of people saying they'd commit capital but not going through with it when closing time came. The seller wouldn't give an extension because - if you recall market conditions in late '21 / early '22 - he would have made more money pocketing the earnest money deposit and putting the land back on the market at a higher price.

The public last-ditch appeal combined with the terms Joel felt were necessary to execute properly (ie, not including land ownership or operational governance rights for investors) made it look very scammy to the outside observer on bitcoin twitter. And few things fire up that corner of the internet more than piling on when a scammer is being called out.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I will say that he was unable to provide the appropriate paperwork to people commiting large sums of money. I was one of the people who asked him for it and then never heard back from him. I'm glad he's still making it work, and I've moved on to other projects. I did, by the wsy, defend him at the time, even though I was frustrated by how he was playing it out on twitter.

Yes. Disconnect between how business works in the real world compared to how he wanted/wants to do it. I was in the same camp as you. Nuked my Twitter account over the whole thing after stepping up to defend him.

I did the exact same thing. Took some heat for it, and I finally got off twitter for a while before resetting my account and then eventually coming over here.

I got banned forever and then came here

got banned for what?

posting bring back the guillotines

That about sums it up