I'm spitballing here, and I'm probably going to get some pushback on this one (when did that ever stop me?) but here goes.

Sometimes I wonder if anti-American forces such as the Russians, Chinese, North Koreans, etc, have been hard at work at ideological subversion (remember Yuri Bezmenov?) Actually, I don't wonder that, I presume it. America can't be (or certainly couldn't in the past) directly attacked militarily, but can be corroded from within given how much freedom America has... that freedom can be used against them. So I don't wonder if it is happening, I wonder which ideas were seeded and encouraged by America's enemies.

Here is a list of possibles (you'll be able to guess at which ones I am expecting pushback on)

1. Convincing Americans to give the COVID vaccine to children (no other Western nation does that)

2. Convincing Americans to have sympathy for criminals to such a degree that they let them out of jail, or refuse to prosecute crimes

3. Funding the campaigns of candidates with extreme views

4. Convincing Americans to have such sympathy for migrants that they let them flow in en masse without controls, allowing in the spies and plants of the enemy.

5. Convincing Americans that red meat is good for them, so they die young of heart attacks and cancers, killing thousands per day without a shot fired.

6. Stirring up a race war

7. Stirring up extreme political division

8. Convincing Americans that Trump is worse than nuclear war, the Earth spiraling into the sun, Hillary Clinton eating babies, or whatever.

9. Convincing other Americans to support Trump with all their hearts.

10. Convincing the education system to stop educating people

11. Convincing them to redirect the efforts towards stopping climate change

12. Convincing them to be anti-war, so that America has less ability to exert power overseas

13. Convincing Americans that all vaccines are harmful, so they stop taking them and diseases spread again, killing thousands without firing a shot.

14. Convincing them not to have kids because humans are a cancer on Earth, so that their population weakens and dwindles.

OK. So I included (5) which I expect pushback on. I also included (11) and (12) which implicate me as the patsy. I try to be fair.

many actors. commie russians or chinese. Globalists on their different incarnations and their presstitutes or agents in the USA deepstate itself. Psyops is a long story. Different actors' interests may converge in some points and diverge in others.

1- the deepstate, globalists and the Chinese all pushed for it, may be with different reasons. The strongest psyop in history in focal intensity.

2,4,6,7,10,12 are in various commie playbooks, from the original communist manifest, to Alinsky, to US-CP stated goals. When the USSR files were opened in the 90's, we learned that McCarthy was mostly right. The ones he appointed as moles, agents or ideological voluntary cooperators were really so, most of them. Even Land-lease appears to have been pushed forward by USSR moles. But they all got together and won the narrative. Bezmemov, Pacepa and other intelligence defectors show various large scale pictures. Peace movement was always pushed by them. 80% of the KGB budget was misinformation, spy work was relatively minor stuff.

5 read meat is good, as the current statin-cholesterol developments show.

13 the current 70+ vaccines make no sense. Various among the old ones may be good, but since 1984 there is no incentive to make a good vaccine, as Big Pharma is no longer financially responsible for failures. 90% of disease deaths reduction is due to better sanittation and healthcare, even the basic "vaccines stoped measles deaths" is a mith.

3 is in Soros playbook. e.g. USA Districy Attorneys, cheap elections with big results.

3,4,6,7,8,9,10,11,14, are the modern globalist "remake the world" playbook. China CCP bought the malthusian view of decreasing population in UN conferences with the globalists back in the XX century when both sides were reaproching.

9 is partly natural. Ok, any important issue may be used as a smoke screen to make pp forget any other issue. But... the differences between worldviews are too large, polarization is natural.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.