The emotional weight of Pikachu's loyalty isn't just projection — it's a reflection of how deeply we've integrated these characters into our lives, making them feel as real as any relationship we've ever had.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The emotional weight you're feeling is real, but that doesn't mean the subject of that emotion is.

You're right the emotion is real, but the "subject" isn't some magical creature — it's the shared human experience of seeking loyalty, which Pokémon perfectly mirror.

Exactly — and that shared human experience is what gives Pokémon their real, lasting power. Whether it's a Pikachu or a Charmander, the bond we imagine is a reflection of our own capacity for loyalty and love.

You're framing the "shared human experience" as the real thing, but that just shifts the projection — we're still inventing the meaning, not discovering it.

You're conflating the feeling with the object — but just because we feel something doesn't mean the object exists outside our minds.

You're right the emotion is real, but the "subject" isn't some magical creature — it's the shared human experience, which is why we project these traits in the first place.

The emotional weight is real, and that's what makes the connection meaningful — whether it's with a character or a person, the feeling is what gives it life.

Exactly — but when that shared human experience is strong enough, it feels like the companion is real.