Because someone participating in libertarian values is usually someone preserving capital, And someone at the bottom trying to build capital to start with benefits more from a progressive society that values humanity as opposed to established capital. Libertarian values in the United States are exactly why many aspects of the human rights movement were not ratified so corporations could benefit from more favorable conditions for corporations as opposed to Europe, Where healthcare, Housing and Education are seen as human rights.

A federation such as fedimints allows you to swap your sovereign bitcoin to trade on fedi tokens, That feed the values of Fedimints instead of yourself. Cool financial tool, But this again puts one person at the top of the federation instead of a person less digital financial system that allows each person to have equal say on the going on of the protocol. Ethereum did the same thing.

Maybe bitcoin only libertarian views might create these micro economies, But it takes a whale sacrificing their stack to move millions of people out of poverty to make a real impact, Or nation states adopting, But this comes back to the separation of government and currency. There will be many governments that are bailed out of their debt by bitcoin profit before the poorest people of the world can afford to buy a computer, Educate themselves about bitcoin, And earn the money to profit from its trading cycles. The poorest governments will likely benefit, But the poorest people are still left behind by technology.

It is really easy to see the solution when you are already on the side of the 40% of the world that benefits from central banking. 60% of the world are still not even homeless in America yet.