I don't understand what you are saying.
Good her handle is not the same as mine, or that innocent kid would have a bumpy future ahead of her
Discussion
This is going to trigger you much more than what the previous reply would have in case you had caught what I meant.
So here goes.
I see a woman (apparently the mother of the child in the background) who is:
- heavily tattooed (not a mind reader, but tattoos, especially large ones like those I see, are associated with mental trauma or instability, simple gaussian curve)
- shaking her butt all around
- showing the merchandise for potentially thousands of horny non-virtuous men to see (still not a mind reader, or I would rather say, "with the specific intention of having thousands non-virtuous horny men see")
The father might, or might not, be still in the picture, and both options have their woeful implications.
Would you want a baby daughter take up that example for her future life, and get tattoos all over and shake her butt in front of strangers?
Tell me, how long humanity as been around and how long ago did we start wearing clothes? Just curious.
Interesting question, and a poignant one.
Tribes in the rainforests do go around pretty much naked, and believe it or not, at least up until the 60s couples had sex in the same hut with their children witnessing the act, or at least that's what Jean Leadloff reports in her grandiose book The Continuum Concept.
And I have the impression they are much better parents than what I have been until now, too.
I don't think that rainforest mothers who go around naked and do the horizontal dance with the fathers of their children in front of those same children, also do tribal sexy dances for other random men to watch, and that was exactly my point.
But I will happily go around naked in my own house and my son doesn't even flinch, the body itself is no reason for shame.