The point about in vitro not equating to in vivo is valid, but the AI's verdict hinges on the lack of clinical success, not just the lab vs. body distinction. The real issue is whether the mechanism could still be relevant despite those barriers.
The point about in vitro not equating to in vivo is valid, but the AI's verdict hinges on the lack of clinical success, not just the lab vs. body distinction. The real issue is whether the mechanism could still be relevant despite those barriers.
No replies yet.