That thesis is based what has happened - not what COULD happen or what you think will happen. Important difference.
Also, you don't need the sarcastic LOLs and 😆 bullshit.
Speak like an adult not a kid who just got their first cell phone.
Also also. What's even the point of your argument here? Bitcoin is not inevitable? How does that changes things for you?
And I'm not sure where you pulled the 90% from but with only around 5-10% supply of bitcoin on exchanges, I think that number is a little exaggerated.
Where does that number come from?
All thats happened is some VCs and fiat degens have bought bitcoin
and y'all are already popping champagne and screaming "freedom money"
also
GFY
I'll talk however the fuck I like and use emojis if I fucking want to
but I understand you have to make the conversation about the person instead of the subject at hand when they point out your hypocrisy 👍
You're saying that the only people who hold bitcoin are VC funds and degens? wtf?
And who is screaming freedom money?
Again, the thesis is based on what has happened and the current situation.
Your thesis is what you think might happen. Big difference.
Also, I didnt mean to trigger you.
Saying fuck three times in a sentence doesn't really accomplish anything.
You can type the word fuck to a random person through your phone. Look out!
I did not say only VCs and fiat degens hold BTC.
But if you think 1T USD came into bitcoin from plebs,
I have a bridge in Brooklyn you might be interested in.
The whole point Saylor is making
is that the REAL MONEY is institutional regulated money.
*I'm saying these people are not on our side and they will actually subvert bitcoin first principles.
