Insider threat from blue-haired fags pushing changes to default node implementations which no-one wants or agrees with.

Undiscovered bugs.

Mining centralisation fucking up baked in incentive alignment.

Global level EMP.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

surely changes no-one wants wouldn't propage? ... unless the majority wanted those changes?

1) is why Knots is at 15% - most Knots-runners don’t know it but they’re opposing blue-haired fags outright

so that could be the answer, 1/5 of people care enough about the change ... think that stat might be biased to the low, for example I haven't updated Core but still use it.

undiscovered bugs is definitely a worry, and so is miner centralisation. not so sure I worry about an EMP - though maybe there are some nuances I haven't thought about yet!

No offence but you’re clearly not a native English speaker. That, or you’re extremely dyslexic, but I’m gonna go with the former.

The reason Knots is at 15% and not 35% is because the drama which instigated it all was largely held on English-speaking Xitter. It hasn’t been translated to other communities yet.

Once noderunners understand a transformer is policing speech around Bitcoin, devs are taking money for PRs, and a DEI woman is acting as the public interface; Knots Go Up.

👍