Hmm. Sort of my points.

I'm saying Bitcoiners would use many things if the need arose, and XMR is one of those. Maximalists aren't as puritanical as we believe when the rubber meets the road, or SHTF.

I'm thinking use is different storing wealth too. That's what I mean about on/off ramps. P2P is great, but less than convenient unless you store an allocation. That is to say the Strike model where you can seamlessly send Bitcoin, lightning, or fiat is good UX. Montero UX has more friction.

I don't NEED to use it, so I don't.

And I don't want to store wealth in something that may face liquidity or convertibility challenges.

Not fudding. Thinking through my position.

If pressed I'd use it, but don't see a compelling need to buy some until it were needed.

I support agorism, but I don't want my wealth trapped in circular economy either.

Again, openly thinking things through. I don't have particular animosity to XMR, but I don't usually think about it either.

My point about alts vs adoption is opportunity cost in time and money. My time in alts cost me 19.6 million Sats I could have owned.