Replying to Avatar jb55

we had multiple integrations but one of them broke (proving my point of my original concern), so now we have one. I was very much against it and would still prefer a better way. I did not personally implement it. I always saw nostr build as a temporary thing like you mentioned.
15
Change this if you want 1y ago

See, the core principle was sacrificed. I don’t want to go into arguing mode and being sofa expert. And we aren’t just dunking on you. The basic stuff was requested for months to all of the devs.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
jb55 1y ago

i think a nostr.build integration is not as bad as a google api integration, since the latter would require us to implement something on a server. The nostr.build integration was the least bad infraction of these principles since we could do everything client side and it’s run by nostr folks, and we had multiple backends.