Tell me, what’s so special about the intel ‘bot’?
All going what you know kinda doesn’t work, and doubt the insight is from having obtained anything, else there would be all sorts of tells about this.
Wanna tell me what the discussion is all about?
Discussion
Probably more politically correct
it's like talking to a libtard on libtard steroids
How the fuck is roger a factor here?’
Got sued?
Lost to the law?
What? 
roger rabbit? don't know him.
Yet imploring ‘more’ as a buzzword to insinuate shit? Wonder whether fame goign and targeting has a snapping effect for some fake reason where somebody feels more comfortable with settling the score with assault rifles
say it with me now: "she has the right to self-defense"
But who’s attacking?
With what traffic pussy cat?
Your vibe or strong language?!
When she sloppy flag to kill people with a thieving fucking agenda going whacking and splitting headaches?!
Curious how that works
here's some insight:
there's one very notorious person who hates censorship just as much as I do, but especially the politically-charged kind (which it almost always is).
who is ultimately responsible for letting that happen?
Censorship? Riddle me what’s being censored here.
Politically charged kinda draws dead to needing to justify the sciences which we draw such conclusions about.
Responsible for letting what happen exactly? The thieving or the faking?
Relevant to the alleged intel bot how? Whose bot is it anyway?
the science of censorship? please tell me computers aren't this stupid.