A real journalist would probably have done that and more. It gives the impression of being an article whose goal is to provoke a reaction or, perhaps, validate the identity they think they have discovered. Please, let's think before we act.
BI made a big deal about nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m sending Fiatjaf14 BTC but didn't even link to the document showing where nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 has been sending funds to developers since he received the funds. https://highlighter.com/npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6/note1lqt46damr5vrpwyuj63mdzrekg0nmkual0evrr73uspmz67ewdgqgjl0cz
Discussion
It's a complete hit piece for some reason.
Only reason beyond a personal vendetta against fiatjaf would be to attempt to tarnish what they can't stop, to try and prevent people wanting to use the protocol the same way some people *still* to this day try and link Bitcoin with drugs and crime to put normies off.
I guess it could go against jack as well.