Yes, it is. There are easier to use wallets, though.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Then why does bitcoin core never asks for 12 word passphrase?

Because it doesn't do BIP39. Here's reason why:

https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/88237/is-there-a-reason-to-why-bitcoin-core-does-not-implement-bip39#88244

Download https://bluewallet.io/ and type your words in. If someone else knows the words, immediately move the #bitcoin to a newly created wallet.

So i was somehow right with my analyzations about these 12-24 words passphrase?hmm..i just couldn't explain it though even if i was asked...but when it creates keypairs (pubkey/privkey)..where do these private keys come from?

As I understand it, you generate the private key and from it generate public key and from it generate all receiving addresses.

That's it?Only they are converted to cryptography?

Then this cryptography itself gives life forms and value to Bitcoin?

Who is Patoshi?

We, the node runners, miners, memers, coders, DCAers, users, writers, podcasters, etc, are giving #Bitcoin the value. Cryptography is just a tool, used elsewhere too, like credit cards or emails.

Patoshi created a myth, shitcoiners love to spread even when it was debunked back in 2013.

Shucks...i always thought i was Patoshi..i mean Satoshi was a genius, god-like and looked up by those who knew and understood his creations while, Patoshi on the other hand does not have to be right, he was just a lone lucky miner...

Why was it debunked?

What were extra-nonce to nonce?

Can someone explain it in a non-technical language and give exampes?

Debunked by people who mined alongside with Satoshi.

The pattern doesn't begin at the very start, and block 9 (the only block other than 0 that we're highly confident was mined by Satoshi) doesn't fit it, yet #Bitcoin was public from hours before block 1. It could have literally been anyone: the "highly improbable" comes purely from not knowing anyone else to name.

Plus "1m bitcoin" is the bullshit number someone would have arrived at by adding up literally all of the first years unspent blocks-- a number which is provably false, since we know other people that mined some of them.

Have a look at these two links, please:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/b0bj3w/how\_do\_people\_know\_satoshis\_account\_has\_1000000/eie9597/?context=999

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/b0bj3w/how\_do\_people\_know\_satoshis\_account\_has\_1000000/eidmwfm/?context=999

Why is Patoshi's name being shown in bitcoinexplorer.org as an Early miner then?Who would've created that?They accept Foundry/Binance/Luxor/etc as legitimate pools but not the Patoshi name?

I haven't looked into reddit links, but i read it had been corrupted by Roger Ver (r/bitcoin)...and he's one of the real shitcoiners there is.

And i don't much about this story,but from what i understand there"s much more to it than we are being told...

No, Roger took over r/BTC where some scammers pretend that Bcash is #Bitcoin to sell it to the newbies. R/Bitcoin is the place to be.

Who were the early Bitcoiner along with Satoshi?

I believe #[16] is one of them.

I was (:

was i¿

And didn't Serge Lerner countered it back in 2020/2021?"The revenge of Patoshi-Deniers",i think was the title?

And why were the Shitcoiners involved with Patoshi?From what i understand Serge Lerner was only theorizing that there was a whale or a Bitcoin large accumulator other than Patoshi?

He had evidence didn't he?

Patoshi Blocks?Patoshi Pattern?

Shitcoiners love to spread it to attack #Bitcoin and make their premined shitcoin less shitty (look, Sahoshi also premined).

Sergio has no evidence, just guesswork.

What evidence is needed?

Linking the addresses to block #9 would be a good start.

Could you zap me?

lnbc400u1p3lwtnfpp5rzf3hnxculvanjyy3kalv6qzfu9yp44l765xfglweg5q5ln7uhtqdq9w3e8jcqzpgxqrrssrzjqvgptfurj3528snx6e3dtwepafxw5fpzdymw9pj20jj09sunnqmwqqqqqyqqqqqqqqqqqqlgqqqqqqgqjqnp4qtkstkxj3wguu4tc5cr2um5y9dnsxaq26xgcpl3futju5wwgfe09zsp54h84ql6ymjmuaar9pdx4seqczdm972cfvw4xl5cg3mv6k3lmh8rq9qyyssqvvuq4c69r2uga2y4zaygm83vx850855m47kzksx79tcfnwx8t433jc8fj0klweynwqg49hkf37tdmeqms4tdeut28l7g9qvqclg8eygpg7sey2

I zapped you. But zapping is not about posting invoices..

Thank you...i have so much to know...is this zapping helping?i mean,how high must Bitcoin go in price to sats have value?

Well the future is unclear but these sats might be very valuable at some point... And its not about the price.. It about that we can do this and nobody can stop us.

And what the Fuck is this about?

What does block #9 have to do with it?

The Bitcoin address?Then what?

It has 2 outputs?

Satoshi2 40BTC

12cbQLTFMXRnSzktFkuoG3eHoMeFtpTu3S

and Hal Finney

10BTC

1Q2TWHE3GMdB6BZKafqwxXtWAWgFt5Jvm3

What do these mean?

You can now view ordinal inscriptions on blockchain.com

First P2P transaction

Broadcasted on 12 Jan 2009 11:30:25 GMT+8

Notable

Hash ID

f4184fc596403b9d638783cf57adfe4c75c605f6356fbc91338530e9831e9e16

This is the first bitcoin transaction between two people, until now all transactions were block rewards to people mining the network. It was made by Satoshi Nakamoto to Hal Finney for 10 bitcoin.

Amount

50.00000000BTC • $1,214,267

Fee

0SATS • $0.00

From

Satoshi 2

To

2 Outputs

Unknown

This transaction has 777,768 Confirmations. It was mined in Block 170

This transaction paid ~40% more in fees due to inefficiencies associated with older wallets.

This transaction was first broadcasted on the Bitcoin network on January 12, 2009 at 11:01 AM GMT+8. The transaction currently has 777,768 confirmations on the network. The current value of this transaction is now $1,214,267.

Hash

f418-9e16

Block ID

170

Position

1

Time

12 Jan 2009 11:30:25

Age

14y 1m 11d 6h 32m 30s

Inputs

1

Input Value

50.00000000 BTC

$1,214,267

Outputs

2

Output Value

50.00000000 BTC

$1,214,267

Fee

0 BTC

$0.00

Fee/B

-

Fee/VB

-

Size

275 Bytes

Weight

1,100

Weight Unit

-

Coinbase

No

Witness

No

RBF

No

Locktime

0

Version

1

BTC Price

$24,285.35

{

"txid": "f4184fc596403b9d638783cf57adfe4c75c605f6356fbc91338530e9831e9e16",

"size": 275,

"version": 1,

"locktime": 0,

"fee": 0,

"inputs": [

{

"coinbase": false,

"txid": "0437cd7f8525ceed2324359c2d0ba26006d92d856a9c20fa0241106ee5a597c9",

"output": 0,

"sigscript": "47304402204e45e16932b8af514961a1d3a1a25fdf3f4f7732e9d624c6c61548ab5fb8cd410220181522ec8eca07de4860a4acdd12909d831cc56cbbac4622082221a8768d1d0901",

"sequence": 4294967295,

"pkscript": "410411db93e1dcdb8a016b49840f8c53bc1eb68a382e97b1482ecad7b148a6909a5cb2e0eaddfb84ccf9744464f82e160bfa9b8b64f9d4c03f999b8643f656b412a3ac",

"value": 5000000000,

"address": "12cbQLTFMXRnSzktFkuoG3eHoMeFtpTu3S",

"witness": []

}

],

"outputs": [

{

"address": "1Q2TWHE3GMdB6BZKafqwxXtWAWgFt5Jvm3",

"pkscript": "4104ae1a62fe09c5f51b13905f07f06b99a2f7159b2225f374cd378d71302fa28414e7aab37397f554a7df5f142c21c1b7303b8a0626f1baded5c72a704f7e6cd84cac",

"value": 1000000000,

"spent": true,

"spender": {

"txid": "ea44e97271691990157559d0bdd9959e02790c34db6c006d779e82fa5aee708e",

"input": 0

}

},

{

"address": "12cbQLTFMXRnSzktFkuoG3eHoMeFtpTu3S",

"pkscript": "410411db93e1dcdb8a016b49840f8c53bc1eb68a382e97b1482ecad7b148a6909a5cb2e0eaddfb84ccf9744464f82e160bfa9b8b64f9d4c03f999b8643f656b412a3ac",

"value": 4000000000,

"spent": true,

"spender": {

"txid": "a16f3ce4dd5deb92d98ef5cf8afeaf0775ebca408f708b2146c4fb42b41e14be",

"input": 0

}

}

],

"block": {

"height": 170,

"position": 1

},

"deleted": false,

"time": 1231731025,

"rbf": false,

"weight": 1100

}

This is correct. All is generated from the seed in the order here.

For example?

And can Bitcoin Wallets also be in Pdf formats?

Already mentioned blue, Phoenix, Blockstream green, Electrum (one of the oldest, not as nice UI but powerful), Breez, etc.

https://bitcoin-only.com/wallets

https://bitcoin.org/en/choose-your-wallet

What do you mean, PDF format? A backup in PDF?

No i think they call it wallet statements?

Sorry, still don't follow. Do you have a link?

What links?

Bitcoinwallet.com

Blockchair.com

Blockexplorer.com

Bitconomics.co