“The omni-win-win system actually outcompetes the win-lose system, while obsoleting win-lose dynamics itself.” - Daniel Schmachtenberger
If we can create a social technology to hyper-coordinate with others, then Game B would be better at innovation than Game A. Then, the only way to beat it would be to coordinate even better, which is in and of itself a more Game B solution.
Social hyper-coordination
That's neat
:Nostr:
Nostr has the capacity to end, or greatly disincentivize adversarial game dynamics. You play the finite game to win, you play the infinite game to keep the game going.
I keep thinking to this term. Resonates so strongly with me, and I've been continually trying to figure out what could create the incentive structures for this behavior.
My best conclusion is that clear communication, and therefore education is at least one of the paths toward that.
