Replying to Avatar ภ๏รtг๏ภคยt

⚠️ DEBATE TIME, MAXIS! ⚠️

The debate isn't about Game Theory—it's about the uneven playing field that makes it irrelevant.

When the government seizes $14 BILLION in Bitcoin, you want to call it "custody failure" or "bad opsec" by criminals. I say that's a cop-out.

The mechanism of seizure (weak keys) is irrelevant to the power dynamic. The state used its legal and physical force to contain a massive portion of the limited supply. You are playing the custody game; they are playing the force-projection game.

If Bitcoin is truly unconfiscatable hard money, then why does the state repeatedly prove it can enforce containment and assert control over billions?

Custody issue, or fundamental political vulnerability?

#Bitcoin #Crypto #GameTheory #HardMoney #BTC #Maxis #Decentralization #Politics #TheStandard #Nostr
Avatar
BTC_P2P 2mo ago

If your keys are secured properly, nobody can control your UTXOs no matter how much power they can project. The keys have to be handed over. That’s the choice of the individual under pressure.

All fiat assets and anything where custody is outsourced can simply be confiscated by the state. Critical difference.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.