This, in Australia, too.
Neither Charles nor the parliamentarians typically even read what they are voting on. They don't write it either, though they act as editors, at least in theory.
If you're looking for actual law-makers, the lobbyists and the bureaucrats are closer to the mark. At least those well-connected enough to socialise together along with the private business elite.
Yes and perhaps America is an extreme example of that with their capitalist driven democracy.
Well, modern Australia's first elite were bent prison officers, and they left a strong stamp on our political culture. The USA's is unironically a lesser evil...
Interesting.
That was, of course, us, the Brits fault.
Sorry 🫂
TBF, most of you weren't even allowed even a symbolic vote at the time.
And the "Enclosure Act" upending of feudal land tenure amounted to robbing most Brits of the land their families had been farming for centuries.
Revolutions from above suck...
Australia has one lawmaker, and that is King Charles III.
The governor-general, who is appointed by the sovereign, signs all the laws.
Talking about bureaucrats and lobbies as lawmakers will eternally remain ineffective.
Fix the problem at the core:
Upstanding Australians have to liquidate the governor-general and all supporters of the British monarchy in Australia.
This must necessarily include exterminating the entire security apparatus beneath the sovereign.
Then annihilate the Marxist state apparatus from top to bottom. All professors, sociologists, politicians, social workers, judges, etc have to be killed off.
Then physically eliminate the Jewish race from the Australian continent.
Marxism is total in scope, so it must be eradicated in its totality.
Marxism and its originators, the Jew, are extremely aggressive.
It can only be successfully countered with even more aggression.
