What's the name for people who aren't religious but think 'proud atheists' are super cringe?
Discussion
think What's but religious super who the cringe? people aren't are 'proud atheists' name for
Self aware and humble?
Based
As a proud atheist, I'm gonna say chicken. They are too chicken to be themselves and stand up to the social norm of being religious.
Sensible? Reasonable?
I could never pin down any self-avowed athiest on what he did and didn't believe. Nor was I impressed by that "there is no god, god is impossible" <---> "just a lack of belief, you can't prove a negative" motte and baily game. That may be one way to win an internet debate, but not genuinely open minds.
This is before the fact that these types obviously hate something they claim to disbelieve in. Militant Athiesm was just a front for high-modernism, statism, and hedonism.
Nice to meet you friend 😉🤝
Agnostic? 😂
Nah agnostic is too unsure about everything
I'm 100% sure atheists are cringe
Lol yeah I'm by no means an atheist. That's a very closed minded world view.
What do you believe?
Well technically I'm a convert Jew. I used to be agnostic, but after tripping on pyschacelics many many times I came to recognize the soul. I don't believe in Jesus or hell, just Adonai/Hashem/Eloheim some of the Hebrew words for God (master/the named/creator) one God and creator.. however I still believe in science and quantom physics.. the observer and his direct effect on his reality and manifestation and shit.. I do think that a higher intelligence has possibly altered our DNA or put us in some kind of matrix resource farm or something.
Do you believe in God? I feel like the simulation theory seems more plausible
I believe something created the universe but it has nothing to do with Jesus or Mohammed or Zeus or oris or any other myth humans created
I don't believe whatever created the universe has individual plans for smart monkies on a random planet anymore than it has a plan for the spider I just squished with me shoe
Simulation... Maybe
I agree for the most part. I think humans project their need for meaning out to the world and it’s led to this idea that we are more important than we actually are. That the world was created for us so we can be tested by a perfect deity is absurd.
Fair, but if you think of Quantum Mechanics, the concepts of omniscience and omnipresence become much more plausible. In such a case, whatever is God might care about you.
This doesn’t prove that God exists. And it certainly doesn’t mean that one should follow any specific religion.
Totally. Don't trust, verify, my dood. Which should make you wonder why I'm saying it.
But check out the video I linked; guy who invented microprocessor talking about the topic.
"CPU inventor and physicist Federico Faggin, together with Prof. Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano, proposes that consciousness is not an emergent property of the brain, but a fundamental aspect of reality itself: quantum fields are conscious and have free will. In this theory, our physical body is a quantum-classical ‘machine,’ operated by free will decisions of quantum fields. Faggin calls the theory 'Quantum Information Panpsychism' (QIP) and claims that it can give us testable predictions in the near future. If the theory is correct, it not only will be the most accurate theory of consciousness, it will also solve mysteries around the interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Intweview by Hans Busstra, Essentia Foundation."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FUFewGHLLg&list=WL&index=15&t=129s
Try pondering the UTXO model of reality/UTXO theory of quantum mechanics.
Normie 🤔