Bitcoin is an honest economic measure and it is not only the Catholic denomination that is ignoring this!
#gm
Argentina will likely go through a hyperinflationary event soon. Our pontiff is an Argentinean. Although he has not even visited his home in the ten years of his reign, I am hoping that this event at a minimum catches his attention.
I believe the Church should condemned fiat currency as a lie and theft of the highest degree. Fiat is a tool for mass slavery of a citizenry by their government.
Nicole Oresme, 1325-1382AD, wrote a treatise on money called 'De Moneta' or 'The Mint'. In it he condemns altering money and profiting from said changes, which is identical to printing fiat. Just read the titles of chapters XV-XVIII.

Can we not say that removing the backing of the USD by gold is exactly what Oresme condemns in chapters VII-XIV?
"""
VIII On Alterations in Coinage in general
IX Change of Form
X Change of Ratio
XI Change of Name
XII Change of Weight
XIII Change of Material
"""
Money, at its essence, is information, a record or account of good done to one another. Gold was a really good money, as it does not decay, is difficult to fake, is measurable and somewhat divisible, but it does not transport well. To represent gold paper money was used, but gold was the actual money, not the paper. Paper was the currency of the money, the form in which it is exchanged*.
By removing the backing of the dollar, the information of good one does for others ceased to be represented in gold and became instead a fiat, a dictation of the government which only says "I'm worth a dollar". This was and still is a theft of the largest magnitude, an entire nations earnings and savings in the currency robbed of them.
This grave sin was orders of magnitude worse than what only might have been committed by the inspiration of Oresme's treatise, a French king who inquired with Oresme about the ethical nature of modifying the money of his subjects. He might have stolen a small portion of the money from his people, but our governments today have stolen much more.
In addition to this, the governments now allow local banks to commit similar theft worse than usury in the form of fractional reserve lending. This further multiplies the available currency another order of magnitude, and possibly more than one after it compounds, and further robs the citizens of their former wealth.
We ought to implore the Church to condemn fiat currencies and fractional reserve lending as fraudulent, a grave sin committed upon a people.
In the meantime, a solution must be pursued, which I believe to be Bitcoin. It is not a fiat currency, because it relies not on an authority to lend value to it, but derives it's value directly from a society's desire for it. It is very difficult to create, highly liquid and divisible, has no decay, and will maintain its value.
The De Moneta of Nicholas Oresme and English Mint Documents, PDF and epub here:
https://mises.org/library/de-moneta-nicholas-oresme-and-english-mint-documents
*Along this line, #BTCLN is the currency of #BTC. It is backed 1:1 and thus good. This not to condemn representative currency, just debasing it or altering the form.
#Catholic #Christian #fiat #Bitcoin #argentina #popeFrancis #CB #lightningNetwork
Discussion
I don't think the Church could outright support it, since it would not be a matter of faith and morals. What must instead happen is condemning fiat currency as a theft by a government of its people.
One must admit that the Catholic Church is the most influential single organization in the world since 1 of 6 people on the planet is technically Catholic (technically, but less practically). If the Catholic Church can condemn fiat, the ripple effect would be enormous. Other faith communities would soon follow.
Perhaps, but as you say, "gold" has failed as an honest economic measure
Are there even any other credible candidates as an honest economic measure at this juncture? If not, then Christians should probably be adopting bitcoin as a moral imperative at this juncture (not least to potentially pre-empt a re-run of the total war of the 20th century)
Also, practically, it is easier for the Catholic church as a massive organization to advocate for bitcoin as an honest economic measure than to attempt to dissect and denounce hundreds of fiats and their respective countries
A great distinction of kind exists between condemning a practice versus endorsing a technology. It is principled to condemn the improper use of gold but not so much endorse its general use as a money. This is because an improper use can be contrary to the faith while the regular use may be neutral to the faith. This is equally true of other forms of money and currency like fiat and Bitcoin.
This is quite unlike something directly relating to the faith such as the one person in two natures of Christ, or the three persons in one being of the Godhead, or another matter of faith.
That being said, a tacit endorsement such as the acquisition and use of Bitcoin could well be merited.
Logical, but consider also the Christian call of peacemaking:
Rather than allowing a long, grinding, economic war of attrition between the USD system and the Rest, the church has an opportunity to precipitate hyperbitcoinization (which is likely to happen regardless) and thereby pre-empt economic war