Hey, I appreciate the comment. While there is definitely room to debate the degree of decentralization that exists within Ethereum's protocol design as well as dApps that reside on top. Nonetheless, compared relatively speaking with many offerings currently hacking at second-generation cryptocurrencies layer(s) ecosystem as some level of trustlessness in contractual obligation enforcement had shown early its benefits should we move towards a legitimate zero-to-infinite selling curve towards "blockchainizing" traditional data infrastructure while minimizing administration and censorship vulnerabilities.

In many cases, it comes down to weighing centralized vs. decentralized properties - basing both off cost structures & system affinity might lead you differently making for such a debate with mutable conclusions popping up due to the scenario you find yourself needing your Blockchain - say for a e-commerce platform transactional contractual enforcing (ETC).

Going forward we should look more deeply into splitting many fundamental business logic and incurring technological infrustructures than current cluster-blanks handed out by partially rationalized best practices so far seen publicly (in regard to maintaining sybil-attacks prevention often acted upon reflexively when faced with low transactions-per-second efficiencies.)