It’s tempting to say that property rights are not a real thing and should not be considered to be.

I’d definitely say that property rights in an absolute sense (like you seem to allude to) don’t really exist. There’s always a state that has a higher level of claim. And then, at the international level it’s all very vague. Like the United States claims it owns New York - California. But in what sense is that claim legitimate?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Agree. Any claims' legitimacy to land, at the absolute sense, are weird when you think about it.