Itβs tempting to say that property rights are not a real thing and should not be considered to be.
Iβd definitely say that property rights in an absolute sense (like you seem to allude to) donβt really exist. Thereβs always a state that has a higher level of claim. And then, at the international level itβs all very vague. Like the United States claims it owns New York - California. But in what sense is that claim legitimate?