Nostr Web Client

From the mentioned post I read:

> When you load your global feed, we only load content from your follows+their follows.

> When you click anything else (like a note or someone’s profile) we load EVERYTHING we have unfiltered from the archive node.

A note about that: a relay don't know what the client or the user do, can only deduce it by the REQ events. A REQ event with a date filter ("since") is highly likely to be used to fill the global feed. A REQ with a e/p tag is used to populate a note's thread. I suppose that nostr.wine works this way.

> it’s a bit like Jim Carey’s The Truman Show

I really like this! :D

The user can see everyting IF a contact (to the N degree) is present in the context, ex. post or reply to a post.

An user that choose to only use a N degree filtered relay for the global should know this limit; otherwise use a free-spam relay ad surf the global flood, or a free relay and fight the global caos :) Different options for different tastes/needs.

I think that we will soon see filters at client level, I'm working on this UX and I proposed it to Gossip too: https://www.figma.com/file/JJQwKYImD2lyzWR81fxo7w/Nostr?node-id=0%3A1&t=DaA8WkRIyXtiD9Lm-1

Gossip doesn't have (for now) a global view, so currently it is not the best tool for discovering new content/users. But you can access all the notes in a thread as long as Gossip can recover them, ex. following the source relays if embeded in the p tag.

I had not time to check the NIP-65, thank you for for remembered me to add it to the read-later list :)

PS: Tried again to zap: "Failed to process LNURL pay" :(

pam 2y ago

On the 3rd deg limitation, I don’t know how users will click and expand spread if they can’t see anything beyond 3rd degree. On gossip, I read from Mike’s note earlier that nip65 is only 1/3 of the gist - and kind-10002 is where the magic spread happens. Gonna look for rest to read.

I love this concept you designed. User motivation to curate their own Nostr experience is an important factor and a game changer in today’s social media dominant world that shapes the generation. Also “topic of interest” was a key component of Twitter - and it makes sense. I also think this would be a natural way to reduce spams as what might be spam to one, might interest another (other than the letters from the Prince :) )

PS : I’ve not checked what’s the problem with zap! But thank you for the thought !

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.