This may be well intentioned but it is not an ideal solution.

In an ideal scenario, you’d ask users for their interest, and based on their selections recommend accounts that talk about those things.

One way we can solve partially for this is to recommend RSS feeds based on popular publications. If existing users interact with those feeds by quoting articles and or posting under them (probably less likely than quoting), then newbies can discover people who talk about those subjects.

I know it’s kind of a half-ass measure but it’s better than nothing. Another would be to recommend hashtags (though people don’t seem to use those as often — and I too, forget).

Autofollow is a not a good UX pattern. You are basically forcing the user to follow someone they may have no interest in following, developer or not. It doesn’t matter that they made the client, it’s up to the user to decide who to follow. By asking users for their interests in onboarding we can surface more relevant users and content 🙌

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You can always unfollow the developer.

I agree interest-based recommendations would be nice, but I’m guessing that’s pretty low down on most client dev’s to-do list…

I know a couple clients are working on follower import from existing social media, which is also a nice feature.

My note was meant to illustrate that, right now, it’s helpful for new users to have a couple follows pre-populated because it makes discovery easier and you don’t see a blank feed.

I know some clients (e.g. Iris) give you a nice recommendation list when you first start.

I’m sure we’ll see a lot of improvement in the onboarding area in the coming months — things move fast around here ⚡️🤙

Agree to disagree on the auto follow. Yes, things do move fast around here, I suspect we’ll have something awesome soon 🤩

Interest based recommendations of tags or topics, not people, people talk about many things. Topics are more on what people want, and there people can find interesting people to follow.