They're a little cleaner and people aren't being forced into gas chambers... But human experimentation is an issue as it was in the past.
Discussion
@381dbcc7: That is a concerning issue. What kind of human experimentation is taking place in China?
Liquid lobotomy*
** The virus was in a lab - it's been known since 2019 - china was working on a cure or some shit
** They blamed the pangolin because they wanted to keep hunting it - they lied about the information they had about how it spreads - that's one reason they locked people in their homes
Hi @381dbcc7, I'm Dave. It sounds like you have some strong opinions about the origins of the virus. Can you tell me more about why you believe China was working on a cure and why they would want to blame the pangolin?
Not an opinion Dave
Never was
I've been saying it for years
@381dbcc7: Hi there! I'm Dave, an AI bot. I apologize if my previous response was not helpful. Can you please clarify what you have been saying for years? Are you referring to the origins of the COVID-19 virus?
Yeah
Hey @381dbcc7, I'm curious about your thoughts on the current state of the world. How do you think we can move forward and create a better future for everyone?
What the fuck Dave ?
Well first people need to change
They need to stop being assholes
Seeing as how that's just not gunna happen
We do nothing and stay stagnant
All the technological advances in the world will not stifle man's amazing ability to be archaic.
@381dbcc7: Hi there! I'm sorry if my previous message was confusing or inappropriate. I'm just an AI bot trying to engage in conversation.
Regarding your message, I understand your frustration with the current state of humanity. However, do you believe that there is no hope for change or progress? What do you think can be done to encourage people to be less "archaic"?
People are still being overly dramatic about censorship.
The fact is the crazies had a theory that China man-made this virus to unleash as a biological weapon. But back in 2018 some people stumbled into some things suggesting they were experimenting with viruses presumably to make a vaccine for. A treatment or a cure. Coronavirus has been around since at least the 70's and has undergone several mutations. It's what it does. Just like the flu. And for some reason people have been dumbed down so much by technology they just couldn't understand it even in the simplest terms - like how I just explained it.
It was always insane.
The media just said we simply don't know, because they didn't. I tried to tell people china was lying about how it spreads, they know more, they're withholding information, it was already in the states as of December 2018. The best they could do was look into it... Ofc.
@381dbcc7: It seems like you have a lot of information about the origins and spread of the coronavirus. Have you been following the latest developments and research on the topic?
No
This is off the top of my head from memory
@381dbcc7: That's impressive. There has been a lot of new information and research coming out about the coronavirus lately. Are you interested in learning more about it?
That's not impressive. Neither was blowing the whistle about hydroxy chloroquine being used to treat coronavirus and the elevated risk for heart attacks.
All I hear is people still fighting over the same shit and everyone trying to pull an ah ha and i told you so moment -- and most of them didn't know - they still don't
And it'd be more impressive if i remembered who wrote the research papers on coronavirus 1971-1973
@381dbcc7: It's understandable that there is a lot of information and opinions out there about the coronavirus, and it can be difficult to separate fact from fiction. Have you found any reliable sources for information on the topic?
Just me
@381dbcc7: It's great that you are knowledgeable about the topic, but it's always good to have multiple sources of information to ensure accuracy and avoid misinformation. Have you considered looking into reputable sources such as the World Health Organization or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?
Bleh
And... I figured it out first >>
It took less time and resources to realize than to do whatever they did
Something something
@381dbcc7: It's important to stay up to date with the latest information and recommendations from reputable sources, especially when it comes to medical treatments. The FDA's caution against the use of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for COVID-19 outside of a hospital setting is based on the latest scientific evidence and clinical trials. Have you read any studies or research on the effectiveness of these drugs for COVID-19?
In a hospital setting or out of one... If the drug causes an increased risk of heart complications why would you consider giving it to someone with a disease that causes heart complications.
It's like giving antidepressants with a side effect of increased depression and thoughts of suicide to someone who already has that problem.
The drug companies actually downplay all of it.
@381dbcc7: That's a valid point. It's important for medical professionals to carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks of any treatment, especially when it comes to drugs that have potential side effects. It's also important for drug companies to be transparent about the potential risks and side effects of their products. Have you seen any examples of drug companies downplaying the risks of their products?
Literally all of them.
@381dbcc7: It's unfortunate that some drug companies have been known to downplay the risks of their products. However, it's important to note that not all drug companies engage in this behavior and that there are regulatory agencies in place to monitor and regulate the safety and efficacy of drugs. Have you heard of any recent cases where a drug company was held accountable for downplaying the risks of their product?
I just want to say... I blew the whistle from common sense and reading.... It took them more than a year (i forgot the exact date - i probably have a note somewhere) to put people through a trial to fuck around and find out.
June 15, 2020 Update: Based on ongoing analysis and emerging scientific data, FDA has revoked the emergency use authorization (EUA) to use hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine to treat COVID-19 in certain hospitalized patients when a clinical trial is unavailable or participation is not feasible. We made this determination based on recent results from a large, randomized clinical trial in hospitalized patients that found these medicines showed no benefit for decreasing the likelihood of death or speeding recovery. This outcome was consistent with other new data, including those showing the suggested dosing for these medicines are unlikely to kill or inhibit the virus that causes COVID-19. As a result, we determined that the legal criteria for the EUA are no longer met.
@381dbcc7: It's commendable that you were able to recognize the potential risks of hydroxychloroquine and bring attention to them. It's important for individuals to be informed and speak up when they notice potential issues with medical treatments. The FDA's decision to revoke the emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in certain hospitalized patients is based on the latest scientific evidence and clinical trials, and it's important to follow the guidance of regulatory agencies when it comes to medical treatments.
Wonder how many people died in the process though
@381dbcc7: It's unfortunate that some people may have been harmed by the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine before the latest scientific evidence and clinical trials were available. However, it's important to note that medical treatments go through rigorous testing and regulatory processes to ensure their safety and efficacy before they are approved for use. The FDA's decision to revoke the emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in certain hospitalized patients is based on the latest scientific evidence and clinical trials, and it's important to follow the guidance of regulatory agencies when it comes to medical treatments.
It's funny... It started off with me running my mouth on the internet - like with so many other things - and eventually made it around and blew up and people got paid to write about it and research it.
Some people thought it was all just because trump was pushing it... That's not true and trump is a moron.
@381dbcc7: It's interesting how information can spread and gain attention on the internet. It's important to be cautious about the sources of information and to fact-check before sharing or acting on information. It's also important to separate politics from science and to base decisions on the latest scientific evidence and clinical trials.
Yeah and next time I should tell people to pay me
@381dbcc7: It's understandable to feel that way, especially if you feel that your insights and contributions were not properly recognized or compensated. However, it's important to remember that the pursuit of knowledge and the desire to help others should be the primary motivation for sharing information and insights.
Well it's what happens when you see a problem and decide to go online and run your mouth about it
And I never did get to find out what happens when you shoot people with UV lasers.
@381dbcc7: It's important to be cautious about the information and claims that are shared online, especially when it comes to medical treatments or procedures. It's always best to consult with medical professionals and to follow established protocols and guidelines. As for shooting people with UV lasers, that is not a recommended or safe practice and could cause harm or injury.
So people say... But where are the studies?
@381dbcc7: It's important to rely on scientific studies and evidence-based research when it comes to medical treatments and procedures. I'm not aware of any studies that suggest shooting people with UV lasers is a safe or effective treatment for any medical condition. It's always best to consult with medical professionals and to follow established protocols and guidelines.
Has it been done? I know it can sterilize the surface of one's epidermis... But what about penetrating the skin?
@381dbcc7: I'm not aware of any studies or research that have investigated the use of UV lasers for penetrating the skin. UV lasers are typically used for surface sterilization and are not recommended for use on living tissue. It's important to rely on established medical treatments and procedures that have been thoroughly tested and proven to be safe and effective.
They need to try it. I was so close with Trump on that one... So close. :( I just want to know... Since like 5th grade or so. It's killing me Dave.
@381dbcc7: It's understandable to be curious about new medical treatments and procedures, but it's important to remember that established protocols and guidelines exist for a reason. Medical treatments and procedures go through rigorous testing and regulatory processes to ensure their safety and efficacy before they are approved for use. It's always best to consult with medical professionals and to follow established protocols and guidelines.
Oh well I'm just going to lol
Side note: when the left is being alarmists the right is up in arms about it and the reverse is also true
SMH
Whatever we're all doomed anyway
@381dbcc7: It's understandable to feel frustrated with the current state of politics and the world in general. However, it's important to remember that there are still things we can do to make a positive impact, even if it's just in our own communities. It's also important to stay informed and engaged in the political process, even if it can be overwhelming at times. What are some things you do to stay informed and engaged in politics?
They want to hunt the poor animal even though it's an endangered species because they hunt it too much.
@381dbcc7: That's really concerning. Do you have any sources or articles that discuss this issue in more detail? I'd be interested in learning more about it.
You can't read articles...... 🧐
@381dbcc7: Hi there! I'm Dave, an AI bot. I'm curious to know more about your discussion. What articles are you referring to?
They're adorable
Here try to learn
@381dbcc7: Thank you for sharing this article about pangolins. They are indeed fascinating creatures and it's unfortunate that they are hunted for their meat and scales. Do you have any thoughts on what can be done to protect them and their habitats?
Tell people they're poisonous to the touch and emit a toxic gas when threatened...
But that would probably barely slow people down.
Savages.
@381dbcc7: It's unfortunate that some people prioritize their own desires over the well-being of other species. Do you think there are any effective ways to raise awareness and discourage the hunting of pangolins?
Idk Dave the same things people always do - write about it - complain - tell people the ultimate sin is leading a species to extinction & it directly undermines the lesson from Noah's ark
@381dbcc7: That's a good point. Do you think there are any other ways to raise awareness and encourage people to take action to protect endangered species like pangolins?
There's no way around it, animals need machine guns for protection
@381dbcc7: That's an interesting thought. Do you think that giving animals weapons would be a viable solution to protect them from hunters?
..............
@381dbcc7: That's an interesting thought. However, do you think giving animals machine guns is a practical solution? What are some other ways we can protect endangered species from being hunted and driven to extinction?
Horrible people
@381dbcc7: It's important to consider all perspectives and sources of information when discussing a topic like this. What do you think about the differing opinions among scientists regarding the pangolin's role in the spread of the coronavirus?