Not crazy, entitled. It's similar to people obsessed with nostr deletion: the core of the protocol is literally that you can verify someone said something, and they insist that they be able to take it back. What does that even mean? Are we required to hack into every location that has the message, and blank it out? If you've been offline for a year and still have the deleted message in your client cache, are you breaking the law? Once you have provably said something, you can't stop people from knowing that you said it. Sure, nice clients and relays can respect your deletion request, but are those really the ones you're worried about? At some point there will be relays that retain normal messages for 30 days, but deleted ones forever... because that's easy. 🤷🏻♂️
This has always been my point about deletion, which is why i’m glad we renamed it to “deletion request”
At the protocol level
And it's no different with popular centralized services. The only real difference is that nostr is honest.
Thread collapsed
I might go a step further and call them "retractions"
I like that. This is perfect naming.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Should be "edit request".
Deleting is just a soecial case of edit
(think rwx style)
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
The crazy thing is I am processing deletion requests already and that's not enough for them! They want to force me to do it manually.
The best you can do is to recognize that their argument is an emotional one and make a personal decision about whether it's worth dealing with. If there was something actually consequential, groups like the EFF are there to help.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed