Hi Brother, I did read your article about the different kinds of "angels" and it's good, thanks for sharing! I'm glad it didn't consist of you saying that cherubim and seraphim are also angels...
The notion of "genderless angels", artistic or otherwise likely comes from the fact that
> Scripture universally refers to angels with male names (Luke 1:19, 26; Jude 9; Revelation 12:7) and with male pronouns (Daniel 9:21-22). When they appear, they are referred to as men. Compare Genesis 18:2, 16, 22 to Genesis 19:1. Also, Luke 24:4, 23 refers to two angels as men.
>
> No angels are referred to as women or with feminine names. There are no angels appearing as females in the Bible. This means that we should not understand these two women in Zechariah 5:9 to be female angels. It would be inconsistent with the rest of Scripture. By the way, it is doubtful that there are actually biological male angels." [(Source:](https://www.neverthirsty.org/bible-qa/qa-archives/question/are-the-two-women-in-zechariah-59-angels/)
I don't think Christians will all become men in the resurrection (despite what the Gospel of Thomas says 🙄); we will likely retain some recognizable correspondence with our previously mortal body, although it may strangely not appear quite the same, judging by the way Jesus was received after His resurrection. And of course Jesus' resurrected body could do things like appear and disappear. My point is our resurrected bodies will be somewhat different, and perhaps might even lack unnecessary organs or even those that led to so much trouble in a past life 😅
As to Genesis 6, I'm more inclined to the interpretation that "The sons of God could be translated 'the sons of the gods'. Ancient texts attest to an ideology of divine kingship; human kings were called sons of various gods." (Note on Gen. 6:1-4 from Guthrie, Donald, *The New Bible Commentary Revised.* Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1973, p. 87.) I think it refers to the despotic rulers of the time who had cities built for themselves and imitated the lifestyle and cruelty of Lamech. They began to call themselves "sons of the gods" and associated with demonic forces (compare Ezekiel 28:11-15; Daniel 10:13). Jude 6-7 speaks against the interpretation that they were angels. If these "sons of the Elohim" were angels, then humans would then have been punished by the Flood for what angels were guilty of.
I think when Jesus' was asked whose wife would the woman who had seven husbands be in the resurrection Jesus' answer was in essence "none of their wife, since there is no marriage in the resurrection." They would be unmarried, like the angels of God. I think the context rules out Jesus referring to the angels' gender or immortality or number of faces, etc.
Good point on quoting 1 Corinthians 2:10: "...these are the things God has revealed to us by His Spirit," though I don't believe the context is referring to sex in heaven as one of them 😄