I firmly believe once he achieved fame and fortune he moved more into mass production and self-reference—something that would be taken to the extreme with the likes of Warhol.

Photorealism perhaps became a good enough aesthetic excuse, but Picasso, while competent enough, was never an extraordinary draftsman to begin with.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

And yes, the general shift in the art markets and tastes of the collector and critics of Paris, London, New York was away from realism, a trend which at that point had been going strong for decades of the previous century.

But certainly at some point, Picasso, Matisse, and others simply set the tone of what gallery art looked like, and so it looked however they chose it to look.

interesting, thank you

Thank you!