Replying to Avatar Marty Bent

As someone who would like to see the federal government in the US shrunk dramatically, I believe a strategic bitcoin reserve accumulated via a mechanism like Bit Bonds is the only viable path to make a smaller government possible.

This may seem counterintuitive - "if the US government acquires bitcoin it makes them stronger." However, when you take a step back and think of the problem of the ever expanding federal government you realize that a large part of the problem is driven by the need to roll over debt by issuing new debt to pay it back.

This leads to a forced expansion of the federal government that can only be reversed if something new is introduced that can defease the debt without having to issue new paper. As it stands today, bitcoin is the only thing that can practically produce this defeasment.

The beauty of the bit bond idea is that it expedites the debt pay back by enabling the Tresury to issue longer-term bonds at lower rates, which works to decrease interest payments on debt that is being rolled over. An incredible kickstarting mechanism that provides immediate results. Imagine being able to point at the chart of the interest expense on the debt and show that the number is falling.

Bitcoin is for anyone, including governments, and it is a great asset that enables individuals, businesses and governments to think creatively by leveraging the benefits that come with adopting it during its monetization phase.

The path to shrinking the federal government dramatically over the next few decades only exists in a world in which the government adopts bitcoin as a strategic asset to begin paying back the debt.

The first step is understanding what your realistic fixed costs are, what your savings rate can be and what your excess discretionary spending is.

Once you do this very little debt is required because you’ve properly identified needs vs. wants and we will have prioritized needs over wants.

We got here by the irrational belief that we should be able to have all of our wants first because credit makes those available with ease.

In doing so, we ignored our needs and created a negative feedback loop of consumption above all else.

We got here by flawed principles. Those can go on, and have, for some time. Eventually they break the money, forcing everyone to look in the mirror. Only then can money can be reset to something that has sound principles and provides economic stability that encourages productivity, proper capital & resource allocation that restores growth.

Until we root out waste and destroy all of the excess spending and remove the negative feedback loop of overconsumption the problem will not be solved and will only worsen. However, it will be painful and many attempts will be made with credit like tools that will only extend the inevitable. Bonds are fine tools but can only be issued from entities that have excess capital, are productive, and encourage proper rate functions (risk/reward).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.