“Its task once terminated, the proletariat has been bled, supposedly as a measure of hygiene. The bourgeoisie, reassured, strutted about in good humor, thanks to its wealth and the contagion of its stupidity. The result of its accession to power had been the destruction of all intelligence, the negation of all honesty, the death of all art, and, in fact, the debased artists had fallen on their knees, and they eagerly kissed the dirty feet of the eminent jobbers and low satraps whose alms permitted them to live.”

Joris-Karl Huysmans. “A Rebours”

On the social implications of loose monetary policy, on the consolidation of wealth, and on the financialization of everything that makes us human.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Zapped. Perhaps just because you used the word proletariat. So few realize the definition fits them.

Anyone who must labor every day and exchange their time for wages is a wage slave to the rent seeking capital commanders.

There is this though…being wealthy isn’t in itself inherently satisfying. I retired a decade ago and still work my ass off every day.

I agree. But people will never believe this. This message they learn from teachers, church leaders, and mentors. But the opposing argument that consumption makes you happy is peddled by the entire market economy, social media, Hollywood, corporate sales campaigns, etc. Moral arguments are painted over with arguments that serve capital and profit.

It takes a thoughtful person and a person who reads continuously to discover this for themselves, and to overcome the successful marketing of corporations looking to push product upon them