I did my best to answer this. Anyone have thoughts?

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqpjv6zpxcv7zpyuc0a7g6efsshw9teqgxx6mfqvuw2temp2esj3lqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwdehhxarj9e3xzmny9uqzqg33gx3rfuey22jnq9ckfqmdsy9h0t224xftztt6slkvgu774adldwdg5w

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So in summary, as this has gone on longer than I intended, utilitarianism is moral bankruptcy because the “greater good” on which it relies is necessarily in the future, and we cannot predict the future with enough accuracy, especially over the medium and longer term, to do a proper moral accounting.

As a result, whoever has power is likely to cook the books in whatever way he sees fit, and this moral philosophy of the greatest good for the greatest number paradoxically tends toward a monstrous outcome — temporary benefits for the short-sighted few and the greatest misery for most.

- Chris Liss

What if one of those 100k was Satoshi Nakamoto pre-2009

thats cheating and you know it hahahaha

😂. However, it’s biblical. Theres a reason why you dont kill good nodes in the network intentionally.