Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Ava

As a Libertarian/Humanitarian who believes in open borders, I fundamentally disagree. The 'brain drain' argument ignores how skilled migrants create international networks that benefit their home countries through investment, knowledge transfer, and trade links. The data is clear: immigration increases innovation and economic growth in both origin and destination countries.

The real issue isn't immigration vs. domestic welfare - it's ensuring fair policy for everyone. Free movement of people, like free trade, creates more opportunities than it removes. Restricting human mobility causes measurable economic damage through reduced innovation and productivity, while harming international cooperation and solving none of the problems it claims to address.

nostr:nevent1qqsv5wdx8v2h35c9nje0utg3w50gy3s7pzcq2vmrk0zn6nh4st62scqpzemhxue69uhkummnw3ex2mrfw3jhxtn0wfnj7q3qcmmswlckn82se7f2jeftl6ll4szlc6zzh8hrjyyfm9vm3t2afr7sxpqqqqqqz8f9536

Avatar
Katja Lutz 1y ago

As an anarchist I would argue that getting rid of borders isn't the problem, what incentivizes migration is: False humanitarianism driven by the government mafia. It is as unnatural as state mafia borders, creates a bad migration incentive and results in a negative feedback loop. True humanitarianism comes directly out of the heart of humans, to help other humans in need, creating a positive feedback loop.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.