As it was built for.

Adoption of a version is a vote for this solution.

I hope, whatever developer opinion about each solution, #bitcoin will stay united for future.

Because having multiple "core" running could be a huge problem if for each new update a new fork exist of people thinking their solution are better to the other. first fork => 2 solutions, 2nd fork => 4 solutions...

There is a time for fork, for vote, and for merge.

Even if everyone don't agree with each other.

The most important here is to keep #bitcoin stability every version could keep that in mind.

Or it will explode from inside.

It make me think of the bitcoin cash experience a long time ago, it was sell as a new very good substitute of bitcoin, but it have finish to trash in the end, and it was "forked" from bitcoin core.

So it is important to have different developer point of view, ofc.

But also keep united on the long term too.

Because the purpose to maintain a stable blockchain is much important for humanity than each individual vision and we can't afford any mess.

And with the current vote-o-craty (showed by adoption of each solution on server), it will be time to see consequences of new choices, and keep the best in the end, then "merge" again.

I don't think increasing/keeping multiple "nature" of node (depending on different developer visions) is good for the stability of #bitcoin.

It is just my point of view of all this.