The only wallets that meet this requirement are those that do not have any secure element.
It is unfortunate that influencers who are not cryptographers, or even computer scientists, are recommending and analyzing hardware wallets.
A Trezor T (despite its vulnerability) with a passphrase of more than 128 bits of entropy is more secure than any hardware wallet with a secure element and a PIN.
Whichever HWW you use, you have to realize that you must use a seed + passphrase with more than 128 bits of entropy, and therefore a secure element becomes unnecessary as well as inadequate because they sell it to you as if a passphrase is not necessary, and on top of that you have to trust something that is a black box, such as the secure element.
It's incredible how much nonsense I have to listen to in this Bitcoin space.
nostr:nevent1qqs25668ywg6prc7c4n39e5ndt83g7geneqyvsxva8pmc0mhcud4l2q09ljnw
I fully agree on this and I would also like to add the attack vector of being registered as a purchaser in a vendor database, which can be even worst if you define your home address as delivery address.
With a #seedsigner or #krux DIY hardware signer, buying the hardware elements from different vendors is completely impossible to really link your UTXO's with any hardware wallet/signer.
Theae last (HW vendors) have created a unnecessary need for the only own interest: their fucking business!
No replies yet.
