Another old thought. If lightning nodes had tags like “zaps” then spinning up a routing node on a sub network you’d be likely to send and receive on would help with channel balancing and reduce friction with self custodial lightning.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Zaps seems like a great use case for a Lightning subnet where there could be a lot of inbound and outbound activity and make it easier to connect to zaps focused channels and be able to get balanced channels without much effort.

Divide and conquer

nostr:npub185h9z5yxn8uc7retm0n6gkm88358lejzparxms5kmy9epr236k2qcswrdp please destroy this idea with your giga brain. I assume there are privacy or censorship concerns.

Solved this one myself - just include “Nostr” in your node name 🙄 found a couple of obvious Nostr freaks by searching “Nostr” on a node explorer and connected some channels