Nostr

You can either end all wars or cure all diseases. Which one do you choose and why?

#asknostr

Please Login to reply.

End the people funding both.

Leave them nothing.

Would the absence of money end either of them?

The absence of central bankers would.

They fund both sides of wars

They fund big pharmcy keeping us sick.

So yeah...

Not that I don't think that the bankers fuel the fire, but I think both disease and war predate them.

I love free speach.

You have the right to think and say what you want.

I love free speech too!

Diseased. Because we can't have a resistance without war. War doesn't always have to be bloodshed.

I tend to agree, I also think diseases kill more people.

On the other hand, disease tends to kill the old and weak, while war predominantly sacrifices the young and fit. Disease feels more fair in a way.

Ending conflicts would result in assets rerouted into other more needed venues.

Wars. Let nature decide who live and who dies.