I mostly agree

but I am convinced that (public meaning) Orginalism is the proper methodology of legal interpretation, so I am somewhat disheartened that SCOTUS is losing credibility precisely as that doctrine prevails

While I would welome a return to Jeffersonian republicanism, my concern is not limited to SCOTUS attempts at restoration so much as the knowledge that we will have to live with (or at least somewhat near) these people (US Brahmin) after the current regime collapses

If we have to make a treaty with them (for example) it is disturbing to think they would regard it as a "living" document, subject to radical reinterpretation

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Not only would we have to worry about them treating treaties as "living documents," but if the US were to split into at least two different countries, the good Americans would still be neighbors to the bad American state, which would still try to dominate and control the good Americans, and might even engage in war to do so.