Okay but I am not talking about ordinal inscriptions, Iโm referring to where you stated that Satoshi had an โexpectation was that there would always be people willing to process some transactions for freeโ. That is simply not the case. The way the network has been built from the very beginning, as per the white paper, is that every transaction is processed with a network fee. The fee changes based on market demand. I personally agree that ordinals are a waste of use case for Bitcoin, however just because I donโt think they are important does not mean they are not valid transactions still. Inflated, sure, but still valid.
TLDR; regardless of inscriptions, Bitcoin always had transaction fees.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=805x1190&blurhash=%5ELE%7BkNWB4n-%3B-%3Bof%7Eqt7xut7ofxu4nt7%25MIUoft7D%25ofM%7BWBt7M%7BIUj%5Bt7WBRjj%5BRjWBRjayj%5Bj%5BIUWBt7WBj%5Bayofaxt7WBofayxuRjofofWBWB&x=4d4ccb740397a52537e291a369fb28b680609b3b093de211c91c4cc4a0309abe