Both promise to keep things private.
Neither can prove it.
I usually avoid identifying information and ppq works great without an account.
Discussion
Right. If the content is actually tied to your personal life it's gonna be super tough. There could still be value in separation between sessions though, so, tor could be something for that.
Right. I trust ppq to not store my queries and ip. At least the ip is concealable.
We found this, it basically scrubs your prompts of PII. The way I figure we might implement is in the settings section create a little checkbox where you can turn this PII redaction tool on if you so choose. It would be kind of an opt in thing because I still have a feeling that it's not perfect and it might reduce quality or make mistakes sometimes.
But what do you think of this idea?
Seems like this option doesn't allow for the sanitization to occur on the client side. That's kind of a bummer. Maybe we can find something else.
Sounds helpful.
For me the biggest concern is whether ppq can correlate my different chats as I can be conscious about privacy in one chat but if all my chats were correlated, it would instantly give away who I am, as in some chats I ask to help author nostr posts that then can clearly be matched to me. And the credit ID is where see a necessity in the current version for the client to send a linkable ID to the ppq servers. So how about instead of a creditID, use a built-in cashu wallet? Then you would still be able to match my chats from the IP address but the Android app could use TOR circuits per chat ...