#[5] , maybe a slight bug in the "@" ref parsing above? I added an errant extra "t" to the end of @npub1rfd0hxdzcze6pzj29thuz34vur57wm9quje7w3edxjgusq6m47csnl7wrt 's "@" ref and now it's trying to find a profile for an invalid npub.

If it helps, my regex for these includes explicit char count:

```

(@npub1[qpzry9x8gf2tvdw0s3jn54khce6mua7l]{58}|@note1[qpzry9x8gf2tvdw0s3jn54khce6mua7l]{58})

```

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.