Agree 100%. They are clueless wallobs about the signal they are sending. Most Phish fans are shitcoiner statists.

Fishman is an idealist above all and I believe even he can see the possibility of being an unknowing cyoherpunk signal spreader.

Not all signal led to Bitcoin. A lot of it became adversarial - like Phishing - which were all sure was highly unintentional in terms of their name.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

A future Phish-like ecosystem might not be able to survive in a world of CBDCs

'You're Supporting a Band Associated With Drug Usage, Concert Ticket Access Has Been Denied'

Ugh

Yes - we can try and reach them through fear - but I would rather go to the source. The band themselves.

I’m getting it clearly through alternate paths or mixed in with the signal you’re sending - can I live while I’m young?

There was a spiritual struggle in the 80s who clearly saw potential in Trey et al. Borh good and evil battled for their creative ears and we got what we got.

Even if the normie Phish fan never gets it - I want Bitcoiners to know our way of life existed. It’s either a cautionary tale of the Lizards or it’s continuing to be written because Bitcoin WAS invented and it changed everything.

💯

It was an easy migration moving from Phish to #Bitcoin because I already understood the effort it takes to build something that spreads virally peer to peer ie through word of mouth guerilla marketing & without substantial corporate marketing dollars placed behind it.

Phish fan/bitcoiner here.