The topic seems to take a big jump from the intro and it bounces around a bit, but I understand this to be ultimately talking about how people are attacking GrapheneOS because they don't understand consent-based data abstraction is not an attack and that "only Pixels stop brute force, via the secure element" and how important GrapheneOS auto-reboot function is, and the USB port control feature etc. in defending against brute force attacks. Is that your understanding on the post? Do you disagree? I'm confused by your reply.