Subnostr

You’re right! And critical thinking without a political motivation is even more rare. Sometimes teachers say they want to teach critical thinking and it really means they want to teach how think like their worldview. To put it simply, I disagree.

Drew F 1y ago

I've had science teachers that severely disrupted my worldview and made me fearful for the future, a nihilist. They told me look at all this _ and would then tell me what it all meant.

As a teacher I think it is fine to put the right books, equations, scenarios, in front of children. They just need to be the ones to fully deduce the conclusion and meaning.

I had an English teacher who once gave me a lot to read, all with subliminal messaging. Although I didn't agree with some of the messages, I loved the teacher more than any other because he didn't tell us how to perceive the texts.

Your students are lucky!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Zach 1y ago

I know what you mean. I’ve heard different perspectives on how much a teacher should share about their opinions on issues. I come down here - a teacher should keep their personal views as much to themselves as possible. Obviously it’s impossible to be perfectly objective or to perfectly hide your biases (some you won’t even be aware of). And your values will impact what you emphasize in each lesson and maybe information you include and leave out. But even with all of that, most teachers can do a pretty good job of keeping the kids uncertain of their opinion if they want to.

The thing is, even if you preface your opinion with “I’m not saying you should believe this, but this is what I believe” you will impact their views, at least slightly. You’re the person at the front of the room, the adult who they (hopefully) respect and your opinion carries weight.