The UK’s Online Safety Act, enforced since March 17, 2025, aims to protect users—especially children—from harmful online content like abuse material and fraud. However, its strict rules, including risk assessments and fines up to £18 million or 10% of global revenue, are causing unintended harm. Small websites are shutting down, unable to cope with the compliance burden.

Examples include:

-LFGSS, a cycling forum with 70,000 members, closed on March 16, 2025, citing liability risks.

-The Hamster Forum and Dads with Kids, niche community sites, also shut down due to the Act’s demands.

These closures fracture valuable communities. LFGSS, for instance, hosted a final bike ride event, showing the real-world connections lost. The Act’s broad approach may be undermining its safety goals. Healthy communities online can create a safer place for many.

Online safety matters, but we need to focus on child online safety education, prevention and awareness that protects the vulnerable without wiping out small, vibrant websites and communities.

Unfortunately, abusers will continue to adapt to each piece of legislation and small communities like the hamster community will pay the price.

The goal should be to prevent all forms of child abuse before it happens and ends up online in the first place. God forbid if abuse happens, online forums and websites should be incentivized to help in the reporting process. The UK solution does neither.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I published a piece on Nostr talking about these issues. It’s long but if you have an opportunity please give it a read.

https://primal.net/eliza/91bf093e47ca5769

TL;DR: Broad UK legislation aimed at improving online safety is causing small online communities, such as a bike forum and a hamster community, to shut down.

nostr:nevent1qqswzm58xapdff60mh3rvxdpqdwc68w3ucpj5kwq9x4qf6lesqf3gsspremhxue69uhkvet9v3ejumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtmvv9hxwtm9dc3k77ql

Some would say that is one of the effects the bill is intended to do. Nothing about this or previous governments is to protect the innocent. Case in point: https://youtu.be/wME-2KNH-9k

I try not to get too tinfoil hat when I think about this type of stuff because it sure is easy to go there.

I don’t think that the outcome will serve victims or survivors and I believe that there is a high potential that it could have the opposite effect intended. 💔

Well, it may be easy to go there when its evident from its repeating consequences.

Everything government touches turns into crap.

Yup. It’s not great.

If it works anything like in US, these regulations are lobbied for by big corpa to eliminate competition and insert middlemen into every business and website with requirements that only big corpa can provide.