Looks like they need a more effective distraction for the Ohio incident . . . by using another train derailment with toxic chemicals.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

……

im seeing a larger pattern here:

blame someone else

create unmanagable problems

and instead of nuking people with overhead stuff,

they're just going to try and kill everyone by releasing toxins into the enviromnment at unprecidented rates, with things such as these.

Nice thank you for post on here bro

Are train derailments the new food processing plant fires

Wouldn’t surprise me

There closing connect bet your ass

What is the prevailing theory as to why the Ohio one is not being covered? What makes it different? I know it’s a bad look, but things like this happen.

It's been covered, but not many people care so it falls down the list.  I did the math on this and the air pollution is less than concerning for anything outside of town.  I haven't done the math on the ground pollution yet however.

See here for my post earlier:

#[4]

Thank you.

There are 3 de-railments currently, most bad one is in ohio.

1700 de-railments happen every year in the US

a 2002 derailment killed 1400 people (was also chemicals)

nothing out of the ordinary... but the ohio one could be a little bigger with the after effects...