Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar stupleb

The Elites have typically been tied to the land and people the siphon resources from, whether this is the true elites or lower down political classes. The peasants, while exploited, typically had their lot thrown in with these elites... and when push came to shove were on the same side. It's why peasants would enlist to fight for their king against a foreign king, even if they didn't like their own king all that much.

Of course, post enlightenment, the perspective makes little sense. And it's only been since the start of the 20th century that the elites weren't tied to the people they rule over. Even in the US, it's only since the 20th century that there'd actually ever be any real reason for a militia to take up arms against the government. And like the Europeans, 99% refuse.

Avatar
R 9mo ago

Europeans can’t comprehend that there is no category of people I’d ever consider “The elites”.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
stupleb 9mo ago

Entirely a mindset a free European would share with you or I in this post enlightenment period.

And yes, you'd (sadly, for Europe) mostly rely on people from the new world to make up the numbers for such a group of people.

Thread collapsed
Avatar
Crazy Horse Malt Beverage 9mo ago

The term "elites" gives them too much allure and status.

I call them "predasites" or the ruling class

Thread collapsed